Testing Strategy
This project optimizes for functional correctness and protocol stability, not stress/performance testing.
tests/test.sh is the one entrypoint: CI, the monorepo driver, and the release
gate all call it, so a mode cannot mean one thing locally and another in CI.
It is written against the agent-first-data
Bash kit, so afdata has to be on PATH (or named by AFDATA_BIN) to drive
the harness — the container it drives needs none of that. Everything cargo
touches runs inside that container; nothing in this suite is built on the host.
Default Gates
Run on every PR.
-
Static checks
bash tests/test.sh static(runs ShellCheck at the pinned version on the host, thencargo fmt,cargo build, andcargo clippyinside the selected test container)
-
Unit + component tests
bash tests/test.sh unit(runs lib/bin tests plustests/check_regressions.shinside the selected test container)- Focus: argument parsing, endpoint URL handling, fetch builder shape, CDP message framing, artifact path resolution, observation/network schema serialization, health/capabilities clients, SDK error mapping.
- No browser process required.
-
Regression list
- Covered by
bash tests/test.sh unit; it runstests/check_regressions.shinside the selected test container. - Every production bug fix adds or updates a regression entry.
- Covered by
Browser Integration Suite
Runs in CI when a browser binary is available, and locally on demand. Separated from the default gates because it requires Chromium installed and is slower.
What it covers
afhttp hoststartup, profile directory lifecycle, listener binding, graceful shutdown.afhttp fetch --render=autoagainst a local fixture HTTP server (gates the HTTP fast path).afhttp fetch --render=alwaysagainst a JavaScript-rendered fixture page (gates the browser escalation path).- Browser default artifacts plus opt-in
storageare produced and readable in--outwhen supported, includingobservation.json. - Deep
network.jsonentries for document, script, XHR/fetch, redirect, failed resource, and optional body capture undernetwork-bodies/. afhttp healthandafhttp capabilitiesround-trip against a running host, including token-required, percent-encoded query tokens, minimal-public-health, degraded backend summaries, real tab counts, and implemented capability feature flags.afhttp cdpround-trip for a known CDP method (Browser.getVersion).- Multi-client attach: two SDK clients to the same endpoint, both observe the same
Page.frameNavigated. - Profile isolation: a
--profilehost’s cookies are not visible to a separate--profile -host. - Profile lifecycle tooling: list/info/lock-status/downloads/delete/prune, refusing locked profile deletion.
- Error code coverage:
navigation_timeout,profile_locked,host_unreachable,tab_crashed,cdp_unavailable,profile_not_found,profile_delete_locked.
Observation artifact tests
Fixture pages cover:
- buttons, links, inputs, checkboxes, selects, disabled controls, labels, ARIA names, iframes, and hidden/offscreen nodes
- stable per-snapshot refs, frame ids, bounding boxes, visible/enabled/focused/checked state, and redacted input value metadata
- explicit non-goals: no generated “login”, “captcha”, “important”, or “best action” labels in
observation.json
The tests compare normalized JSON snapshots. Browser-version-specific geometry tolerance is allowed only for pixel-level bounding-box drift.
Network artifact tests
Fixture pages cover:
- top-level document load, redirects, script/style/image resources, XHR/fetch JSON, GraphQL-shaped JSON, failed requests, cached requests, and service-worker responses when supported
- default redaction for
Cookie,Authorization,Proxy-Authorization,Set-Cookie, and token/secret-like headers --network-bodies off|xhr|all, per-body byte limits, UTF-8 text bodies, binary bodies, and body-capture warning paths
The network tests assert structure and linkage rather than exact event order when CDP does not guarantee ordering across resource types.
Health, capabilities, and profile tests
Unit tests cover JSON shapes without a browser. Integration tests cover:
/healthshallow readiness before and after browser startup, plus degraded status when the browser process exits/capabilitiesmatching the selected backend and reporting unsupported artifacts as unsupported rather than absentafhttp profilebehavior on real temp profile roots, including metadata creation, missing metadata fallback, lock detection, captured-download listing, delete confirmation, and prune dry-runs
Browser discovery
The suite respects, in order:
AFHTTP_TEST_BROWSER_BINenvironment variable (explicit path).which chromium,which chrome,which google-chrome-stable.- Standard install paths per platform (
/Applications/Google Chrome.app/...,/usr/bin/chromium,C:\Program Files\Google\Chrome\...).
When none is found, the suite is skipped, not failed, with a clear log line so the CI matrix can either provide a browser or accept the skip.
Running locally
Native arm64 test images do not need Rosetta. If Apple container reports that
Rosetta is unavailable while creating its builder, set the user configuration
at ~/.config/container/config.toml before running the fixed gate:
[build]
rosetta = false
# Default gates (Apple container on local macOS)
bash tests/test.sh
# Full integration suite (Apple container on local macOS)
bash tests/test.sh integration
# The integration mode runs real test files including:
# tests/browser_fetch.rs, tests/fetch_http_only.rs, tests/health_capabilities.rs,
# tests/cdp_proxy.rs, tests/cookie_jar_isolation.rs, tests/env_isolation.rs,
# tests/display_takeover.rs, tests/network_artifact.rs, and tests/tabs_management.rs
CI (.github/workflows/ci.yml)
Linux is covered by the integration-docker job, which runs the full
integration suite through the Docker harness (real chromium + every backend +
KasmVNC, AFHTTP_NO_SANDBOX=1 so the in-container sandbox is off). There is no
ubuntu native leg: the ubuntu runner’s chromium is a confined snap that can’t
complete download-to-disk tests.
The native integration matrix validates the binaries actually shipped, and
runs with Chromium’s sandbox on (no AFHTTP_NO_SANDBOX) since these are
normal desktops:
| OS | Browser | Source |
|---|---|---|
| macos-latest | Chrome | preinstalled by GitHub-hosted runner (Homebrew binary) |
| windows-latest | Chrome | preinstalled by GitHub-hosted runner (Scoop binary) |
The matrix sets RUST_MIN_STACK=16 MiB so the deep fetch/host future chain
doesn’t overflow Windows’ small default thread stack.
The fixed harness selects Apple container on local macOS and Docker in CI.
AFHTTP_TEST_CONTAINER_RUNTIME=apple|docker is available for an explicit
backend check; ordinary local runs need no override.
The flaky-by-design display takeover suite runs in its own non-blocking
nightly workflow (.github/workflows/takeover-panel.yml), not in the gating
ci.yml. The Lightpanda backend is exercised inside integration-docker when
its binary is present.
Display Takeover Tests
Real-display takeover is exercised through the display_takeover.rs integration
suite: it boots an afhttp host --takeover-provider kasmvnc, asserts the host brings up
the KasmVNC display provider, serves /takeover/panel through the
authenticated listener, and reports display_takeover: true in /capabilities.
These run in the nightly takeover workflow because the provider startup is
timing-sensitive and version-dependent.
tests/takeover-in-workbench.sh is the other half, and is deliberately not a
gate. It takes a real takeover — Xvnc, a headful browser on its display, a real
afhttp ui takeover --mode session — and puts it behind
agent-first-ui’s afui session serve, then drives the result with a real
Chromium over CDP. It reports what it observed (HTTP statuses, the first RFB
frame off the WebSocket, what each browser document says about its own origin
and storage) rather than only whether it passed, and it writes screenshots to
target/. It needs a checkout of agent-first-ui beside this repository and
refuses to run without one, which is why it stays out of tests/test.sh.
What is not tested
- Anti-detection effectiveness. Whether a specific site classifies a
takeover-driven session as bot or human is non-deterministic and
version-dependent. The architecture’s risk-control statements
(
architecture.md §9) are deliberately framed as honest assessments, not test contracts. - Performance / throughput. The project does not promise latency or request-per-second targets.
- Network conditions. Tests assume the loopback / fixture server is reachable; no chaos/network-impairment testing.